Polymer Innovation Blog

Practical tips and advice for polymer, innovation and product development professionals

Polymer Innovation
  • Home
  • eBooks
    • Polymers in Electronic Packaging
    • Rheology of Thermosets eBook
    • Practical Tips for Curing Thermosets
    • Thermoset Characterization
    • Dielectric Cure Monitoring of Thermosets
    • Introduction to Biopolymers and Bioplastics
  • Videos
    • Core Curriculum: 3 Part Video Series
    • Characterization of Thermosets: 4 Part Video Series
    • Advanced Thermoset Cure Kinetics: 3 Part Video Series
    • DSC of Polymers: 5 Part Video Series
    • Thermoplastics: 5 Part Video Series
  • Services
    • Consulting
    • Polymer Expert Witness
  • Learning Center
    • White Paper
  • Why Jeff?
    • Speaker Info
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Members
    • Login
    • Logout

Rheology of Thermosets Part 13: Composite Lamination Case Study – 3

June 1, 2015 By Jeffrey Gotro 1 Comment

Flow number versus time for aborted flow testing

In the last post we presented the basics of the flow test and how to use the aborted flow test to determine the flow number as a function of time for various heating rates (figure on the left).  In this post we will describe a method to measure flow continuously as a function of time.  The focus here was to understand the large scale flow during lamination of large laminates and how the rheology impacts the flow.  The flow test is a squeezing flow geometry. 

The squeezing flow geometry was investigated in detail by several investigators including Leider (1), Leider and Bird (2) and Grimm (3) along with treatments by Bird, Armstrong and Hassager (4) and covered nicely by Macosko (5) There are multiple references in these two books to enable more in-depth study for the interested reader. Note that the original layup thickness is designated at 2h. 

squeezing flow geometry

During lamination, the rate of plate motion is given by the Stefan equation (6):

Stefan equation for squeezing flow Examination of the Stefan equation shows that the rate of plate motion (at constant force, F, and sample size R) is governed by two key parameters; the height of the layup and the viscosity.  In theory, if one were to measure the plate motion as a function of time, one could develop a continuous measurement of the flow versus time during lamination. 

In the following figure, the experimental test figure used to precisely measure the plate closure is shown:

continuous method to measure resin and prepreg flow

The above custom designed fixture was developed at Syracuse University under the direction of Dr. George Martin, Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and is described in Tungare, Martin, and Gotro (7).  The fixture was used in a typical Instron test frame where the force could be carefully applied and measured by the load cell.  The Instron frame had a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) to measure the movement of the crossheads.  In order to simulate the flow test conditions, a stainless steel plate, fluorocarbon release sheets and the prepreg layup could be loaded into the test frame.  Note; a neat resin disk could also be pre-molded and used to investigate the viscosity profile for the resin only (7).

The conditions for the Stefan equation are:

  • Plate separation changes sufficiently slowly (quasi-steady state)
  • Stress overshoot and inertial terms are negligible
  • Polymer may be approximates as Newtonian

At constant force, the Stefan equation may be integrated to obtain:

integrated form of the Stefan equation

Note that the viscosity must be represented by an integral relationship due to the time-temperature dependence of the viscosity. Thus by measuring the plate closure rate insights into the viscosity profile could be obtained.

In the next post we will show how the time-dependent plate motion is related to the flow number and show experimental data of flow number versus time using the squeezing flow geometry.

 

References

1) Leider, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 13, 342 (1974)

2) Leider and Bird, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 13, 336 (1974)

3) Grimm, A.I.Ch.E. J., 24, 428 (1978)

4) Bird, Armstrong and Hassager (Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Vol 1. Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, p. 21, 1987

5) Macosko, Rheology Principles, Measurements, and Applications, VCH Publishers, p. 270, 1994). 

6) Stefan, Sitzber. K. Akad. Wiss. Math. Natur., Wien, 69, Part 2, 713 (1874)

7) Tungare, Martin, and Gotro, Polym.Eng. and Sci., 28, no. 16, 1071, (1988)

Share on LinkedIn Share

Filed Under: Uncategorized

« Rheology of Thermosets Part 12: Composite Lamination Case Study – 2
Rheology of Thermosets Part 14: Composite Lamination Case Study – 4 »

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Polymer Innovation Blog

I’m Dr. Jeff Gotro and welcome to the Polymer Innovation Blog. Over the last 40 years I have been involved in polymer research, along with product and process development. I acquired invaluable experience working for IBM, AlliedSignal, Honeywell, Ablestik Labs (now Henkel) and in multiple consulting projects. In this blog, I (along with some guest contributors) will share our experiences, tips, and “tricks of the trade” to get more out of your innovation efforts and discuss new trends and technical advances in the polymer industry.
View Jeff Gotro, Ph.D., CMC's profile on LinkedIn

Innocentrix, LLC


Click to Visit Website

plastics expert witness
Click for More Information

Subscribe by Email

Search the Blog

Polymer Video Training

Visit our Video Store

Polymers in Electronic Packaging

polymers in electronic packaging Are you confused about what is electronic packaging? Have you ever wondered what type of polymers and polymer-based composites are used in electronics? Learn More...

Practical Tips for Curing Thermosets

practical tips for curing thermosets Have you ever had a question about the degree of cure or is your part fully cured after processing? Confused about what is gelation or how does vitrification impact thermoset curing? Learn More...

Rheology of Thermosets

rheology of thermosets Have you ever had a question about measuring the rheological properties of thermosets Didn’t know what is the right experimental approach to get the right rheological information? Learn More...

Dielectric Cure Monitoring of Thermosets

Dielectric Cure Monitoring of Thermosets Do you have a need for an in-situ cure monitor for a thermoset process but don’t know where to start? Are you confused about the terminology used in dielectric spectroscopy? Learn More...

Introduction to Biopolymers and Bioplastics

Introduction to Biopolymers and Bioplastics Would you like to know how sustainable are bio-based polymers? Or what is the market size and growth rate for bioplastics? Or have questions about the biomass supply chain? Learn More...

Thermoset Characterization

Thermoset Characterization Have you ever had a question about how to measure a physical property of a thermoset? Confused about what is gelation or how does vitrification impact thermoset curing profiles? Or wondered how to measure the glass transition temperature of an epoxy or polyester composite? Learn More...

Amazon.com Bookshelf

Robert's Rules of Innovation Thermal Analysis of Polymers Order

Copyright © 2025 Innocentrix, LLC · All Rights Reserved